Skip to content
CLEARAGE Parent notes on movies
← All movies
The Good Liar poster

The Good Liar

Parents guide · ClearAge age 16+ · Official MA15+

Movie 2019 109 min Crime Reviewed by Dan S · Checked 23 Sep 2020
Official Rating MA 15+ ClearAge 16+

Why our age differs

Official is MA15+. We say 16+ because rape is spoken as lived history late in the story, not a distant rumour, and that lands heavier for teens

What we flagged

View all categories
Violence
Moderate
Sex and Nudity
Moderate
Frightening
Mild
Language
Moderate

Our take

The Good Liar is an adult con drama in which old crimes surface beneath a polite romance. Murder, guns, and wartime killing are discussed, while rape is named directly in late revelations. Strong language is pointed rather than constant, and people drink socially. We put it at around 16 and up, with a parent nearby for the sexual-violence disclosure and psychological cruelty.

Uplifting themes

Under the cons sits a harder idea about justice deferred and truth arriving late. Charm is not the same as care. Families can talk about patience versus revenge without cheering every twist Almost everyone is running a scheme. Moments of loyalty appear, then get complicated. Better used as a cautionary pair than as models to copy

Story (may spoil tone)

Career con man Roy sets his sights on his latest mark: recently widowed Betty, worth millions. And he means to take it all. But as the two draw closer, what should have been another simple swindle takes on the ultimate stakes.

What we flagged

View all categories

Violence
Moderate
Sex and Nudity
Moderate
Frightening
Mild
Language
Moderate

Details

Violence Moderate Murder, guns, and wartime killings surface as the con unravels. A bomb…

Murder, guns, and wartime killings surface as the con unravels. A bomb and mass death in the past are named without a long battle scene. Tension comes from threat and history more than street brawls

Language Moderate The f-word appears in bursts, with hell and a harsh sexual insult in an…

The f-word appears in bursts, with hell and a harsh sexual insult in anger. Swearing is moderate but pointed. Adult ears will notice the edge

Sex / nudity Moderate Sex is discussed as part of the romance and the con. There is also a st…

Sex is discussed as part of the romance and the con. There is also a strip-club scene in which women dance topless, with breast nudity visible

Drugs / alcohol Mild Vodka martinis and shared drinks oil the dinner-table charm. Alcohol is…

Vodka martinis and shared drinks oil the dinner-table charm. Alcohol is social polish for the scam. Not about addiction

Frightening Mild The scare is slow and psychological: who is lying, and what will they d…

The scare is slow and psychological: who is lying, and what will they do when the mask slips. Late revelations darken the room. Jump scares are not the point

Self-harm / suicide Mild Suicide is mentioned in historical talk, including a woman who died tha…

Suicide is mentioned in historical talk, including a woman who died that way and a famous wartime death. No method is shown. Still a sober beat in an already heavy last act

Sexual violence Moderate A character says she was raped in the past, and the accusation appears…

A character says she was raped in the past, and the accusation appears again in writing. No graphic assault is staged, but the disclosure is direct

Gore / death / weapons Mild Guns and murder are part of the backstory, along with wartime killings.…

Guns and murder are part of the backstory, along with wartime killings. The film discusses much of this violence without sustained injury close-ups

Flashing lights We have not confirmed whether this version contains flashing lights.

We have not confirmed whether this version contains flashing lights.

Add a watch note

What did your family do? Required
Kids in the room Optional
ClearAge age feel Optional

0/280

Talk after watching

  • Both people are playing a longer game than they admit. How do you tell charm from manipulation?
  • The film brings wartime sexual violence into the present. Why does naming that history change how you see the con?